A few days ago, I caught a quick glimpse of a discussion in a Facebook group about DNA tests and DAR proofs. I didn’t have much time to read the whole discussion, but the gist was that the DNA results were not accepted as proof, in conjunction with other documentation, all of which clearly identified the woman as a descendant.
Today, I came across an article in the Washington Post about the same topic. Whether it was the same woman, I’m not sure, as I wasn’t able to relocate the Facebook discussion. The debate is quite interesting…read for yourself.